Video models · Wan vs Kling

    Wan Video 2.5 Text to Video vs Kling 3 Turbo Text to Video

    Wan Video 2.5 Text to Video runs 25-150 credits a job, Kling 3 Turbo Text to Video runs 28-135 credits.

    Which should you pick?

    Wan Video 2.5 Text to Video is the cheaper job: 25-150 credits against 28-135 credits for Kling 3 Turbo Text to Video. Those are the credits one complete generation costs, not a headline rate, so they are directly comparable even though the two models bill differently.

    At their most expensive settings the gap widens: Wan Video 2.5 Text to Video tops out at 150 credits a job versus 135, driven by output resolution.

    What a job costs

    Wan Video 2.5 Text to Video

    25-150 credits

    It bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and the price moves with output resolution.

    • SD5 credits
    • HD10 credits
    • 4K15 credits

    Kling 3 Turbo Text to Video

    28-135 credits

    It bills per second of output, and the price moves with clip length.

    • Price10 credits

    All figures are Versely credits. Your plan's credit allowance is on the pricing page.

    Spec comparison

    SpecWan Video 2.5 Text to VideoKling 3 Turbo Text to Video
    ProviderWanKling
    Cost per job25-150 credits28-135 credits
    Billingper second, at a rate that changes with output resolutionper second of output
    Max resolution1080p1080p
    Aspect ratios16:9, 9:16, 1:116:9, 9:16, 1:1
    Durations5s, 10s3s, 4s, 5s, 6s, 7s, 8s, 9s, 10s, 11s, 12s, 13s, 14s, 15s
    Frame rates24fps, 30fps, 60fps
    Qualities480p, 720p, 1080p720p, 1080p
    Requires starting imageNoNo
    Accepts video inputNoNo
    Reference images
    LeaderboardUnrankedUnranked
    ReleasedSep 24, 2025Jun 17, 2026

    What each one does that the other doesn't

    Only Wan Video 2.5 Text to Video

    high quality, professional

    Only Kling 3 Turbo Text to Video

    Nothing the other one doesn't also list.

    Both list: text to video, text to video.

    More comparisons

    Frequently asked questions

    Which is cheaper, Wan Video 2.5 Text to Video or Kling 3 Turbo Text to Video?+

    Wan Video 2.5 Text to Video is cheaper per job: 25-150 credits against 28-135 credits for Kling 3 Turbo Text to Video.

    What can Wan Video 2.5 Text to Video do that Kling 3 Turbo Text to Video can't, or vice versa?+

    Only Wan Video 2.5 Text to Video lists high quality, professional. Both list text to video, text to video.

    How do Wan Video 2.5 Text to Video and Kling 3 Turbo Text to Video bill?+

    Wan Video 2.5 Text to Video bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and its price moves with output resolution. Kling 3 Turbo Text to Video bills per second of output, and its price moves with clip length. Both are charged in Versely credits.

    How long a clip can Wan Video 2.5 Text to Video and Kling 3 Turbo Text to Video generate?+

    Wan Video 2.5 Text to Video supports 5s, 10s; Kling 3 Turbo Text to Video supports 3s, 4s, 5s, 6s, 7s, 8s, 9s, 10s, 11s, 12s, 13s, 14s, 15s.

    Try both inside Versely

    The all-in-one AI studio for creators. 60+ models for video, image, voice, music and lipsync in a single app.