Which should you pick?
Vidu Q3 Image to Video is the cheaper job: 18-116 credits against 25-113 credits for Wan 2.6 Image to Video Flash. Those are the credits one complete generation costs, not a headline rate, so they are directly comparable even though the two models bill differently.
At their most expensive settings the gap widens: Vidu Q3 Image to Video tops out at 116 credits a job versus 113, driven by output resolution.
What a job costs
Wan 2.6 Image to Video Flash
25-113 credits
It bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and the price moves with output resolution.
- SD/HD5 credits
- 4K8 credits
Vidu Q3 Image to Video
18-116 credits
It bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and the price moves with output resolution.
- SD4 credits
- HD/4K8 credits
All figures are Versely credits. Your plan's credit allowance is on the pricing page.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Wan 2.6 Image to Video Flash | Vidu Q3 Image to Video |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Wan | Vidu |
| Cost per job | 25-113 credits | 18-116 credits |
| Billing | per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution | per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution |
| Max resolution | 1080p | 1080p |
| Aspect ratios | — | — |
| Durations | 5s, 10s, 15s | 5s, 10s, 15s |
| Frame rates | — | — |
| Qualities | 720p, 1080p | 1080p, 360p, 540p, 720p |
| Requires starting image | Yes | Yes |
| Accepts video input | No | No |
| Reference images | — | — |
| Leaderboard | Unranked | #12 in image to video |
| Released | Dec 16, 2025 | Jan 30, 2026 |
What each one does that the other doesn't
Only Wan 2.6 Image to Video Flash
ultra fast, efficient
Only Vidu Q3 Image to Video
motion generation, high fidelity
Both list: image to video, image to video.
Leaderboard positions
Versely ranks each capability on its own leaderboard, so a position is only comparable between two models within the same row.
Wan 2.6 Image to Video Flash
Not on a Versely leaderboard yet.
Vidu Q3 Image to Video
- Image to video#12
More comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Wan 2.6 Image to Video Flash or Vidu Q3 Image to Video?+
Vidu Q3 Image to Video is cheaper per job: 18-116 credits against 25-113 credits for Wan 2.6 Image to Video Flash.
What can Wan 2.6 Image to Video Flash do that Vidu Q3 Image to Video can't, or vice versa?+
Only Wan 2.6 Image to Video Flash lists ultra fast, efficient. Only Vidu Q3 Image to Video lists motion generation, high fidelity. Both list image to video, image to video.
How do Wan 2.6 Image to Video Flash and Vidu Q3 Image to Video bill?+
Wan 2.6 Image to Video Flash bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and its price moves with output resolution. Vidu Q3 Image to Video bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and its price moves with output resolution. Both are charged in Versely credits.
How long a clip can Wan 2.6 Image to Video Flash and Vidu Q3 Image to Video generate?+
Wan 2.6 Image to Video Flash supports 5s, 10s, 15s; Vidu Q3 Image to Video supports 5s, 10s, 15s.
Try both inside Versely
The all-in-one AI studio for creators. 60+ models for video, image, voice, music and lipsync in a single app.