Video models · Google vs LTX

    VEO 3.1 vs LTX 2.3 Text to Video Fast

    VEO 3.1 runs 80-320 credits a job, LTX 2.3 Text to Video Fast runs 24-320 credits.

    Which should you pick?

    LTX 2.3 Text to Video Fast is the cheaper job: 24-320 credits against 80-320 credits for VEO 3.1. Those are the credits one complete generation costs, not a headline rate, so they are directly comparable even though the two models bill differently.

    VEO 3.1 holds the stronger leaderboard position (#15 in text to video against #41 in text to video). Those are two different leaderboards unless the category matches — Versely ranks each capability separately.

    VEO 3.1 supports more aspect ratios (3: 16:9, 9:16, auto), giving it more format flexibility.

    What a job costs

    VEO 3.1

    80-320 credits

    It bills by whether audio is generated, and the price moves with audio options.

    • Audio off20 credits
    • Audio on40 credits

    LTX 2.3 Text to Video Fast

    24-320 credits

    It bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and the price moves with output resolution.

    • SD/HD4 credits
    • 4K16 credits

    All figures are Versely credits. Your plan's credit allowance is on the pricing page.

    Spec comparison

    SpecVEO 3.1LTX 2.3 Text to Video Fast
    ProviderGoogleLTX
    Cost per job80-320 credits24-320 credits
    Billingby whether audio is generatedper second, at a rate that changes with output resolution
    Max resolution4K4K
    Aspect ratios16:9, 9:16, auto16:9, 9:16
    Durations4s, 6s, 8s6s, 8s, 10s, 12s, 14s, 16s, 18s, 20s
    Frame rates24fps, 30fps, 60fps
    Qualities720p, 1080p, 4K1080p, 1440p, 2160p
    Requires starting imageNoNo
    Accepts video inputNoNo
    Reference images
    Leaderboard#15 in text to video#41 in text to video
    ReleasedOct 15, 2025Mar 5, 2026

    What each one does that the other doesn't

    Only VEO 3.1

    cinematic, enhanced, premium

    Only LTX 2.3 Text to Video Fast

    fast, text driven, high quality, multi resolution, audio generation

    Both list: text to video.

    Leaderboard positions

    Versely ranks each capability on its own leaderboard, so a position is only comparable between two models within the same row.

    VEO 3.1

    • Text to video#15
    • Image to video#25

    LTX 2.3 Text to Video Fast

    • Text to video#41

    More comparisons

    Frequently asked questions

    Which is cheaper, VEO 3.1 or LTX 2.3 Text to Video Fast?+

    LTX 2.3 Text to Video Fast is cheaper per job: 24-320 credits against 80-320 credits for VEO 3.1.

    What can VEO 3.1 do that LTX 2.3 Text to Video Fast can't, or vice versa?+

    Only VEO 3.1 lists cinematic, enhanced, premium. Only LTX 2.3 Text to Video Fast lists fast, text driven, high quality, multi resolution, audio generation. Both list text to video.

    How do VEO 3.1 and LTX 2.3 Text to Video Fast bill?+

    VEO 3.1 bills by whether audio is generated, and its price moves with audio options. LTX 2.3 Text to Video Fast bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and its price moves with output resolution. Both are charged in Versely credits.

    Which ranks higher, VEO 3.1 or LTX 2.3 Text to Video Fast?+

    VEO 3.1 sits at #15 in text to video and LTX 2.3 Text to Video Fast at #41 in text to video on Versely's live model rankings. Versely ranks each capability on its own leaderboard, so those positions are only a direct comparison when the category is the same.

    How long a clip can VEO 3.1 and LTX 2.3 Text to Video Fast generate?+

    VEO 3.1 supports 4s, 6s, 8s; LTX 2.3 Text to Video Fast supports 6s, 8s, 10s, 12s, 14s, 16s, 18s, 20s.

    Try both inside Versely

    The all-in-one AI studio for creators. 60+ models for video, image, voice, music and lipsync in a single app.