Video models · Wan vs Hailuo

    Wan 2.6 Image to Video vs Hailuo 2.3 Standard

    Wan 2.6 Image to Video runs 20-90 credits a job, Hailuo 2.3 Standard runs 23-45 credits.

    Which should you pick?

    Wan 2.6 Image to Video is the cheaper job: 20-90 credits against 23-45 credits for Hailuo 2.3 Standard. Those are the credits one complete generation costs, not a headline rate, so they are directly comparable even though the two models bill differently.

    At their most expensive settings the gap widens: Wan 2.6 Image to Video tops out at 90 credits a job versus 45, driven by output resolution.

    Wan 2.6 Image to Video supports more aspect ratios (2: 16:9, 9:16), giving it more format flexibility.

    What a job costs

    Wan 2.6 Image to Video

    20-90 credits

    It bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and the price moves with output resolution.

    • SD/HD4 credits
    • 4K6 credits

    Hailuo 2.3 Standard

    23-45 credits

    It bills in tiers, and the price moves with clip length.

    • Up to 6s23 credits
    • Up to 10s45 credits

    All figures are Versely credits. Your plan's credit allowance is on the pricing page.

    Spec comparison

    SpecWan 2.6 Image to VideoHailuo 2.3 Standard
    ProviderWanHailuo
    Cost per job20-90 credits23-45 credits
    Billingper second, at a rate that changes with output resolutionin tiers
    Max resolution1080p1080p
    Aspect ratios16:9, 9:16
    Durations5s, 10s, 15s6s, 10s
    Frame rates
    Qualities720p, 1080pHD, 1080p
    Requires starting imageYesYes
    Accepts video inputNoNo
    Reference images
    Leaderboard#42 in image to videoUnranked
    ReleasedDec 15, 2025Oct 27, 2025

    What each one does that the other doesn't

    Only Wan 2.6 Image to Video

    high quality, audio support, prompt expansion, multi resolution, state of the art

    Only Hailuo 2.3 Standard

    text to video, standard, reliable, efficient

    Both list: image to video, image to video.

    Leaderboard positions

    Versely ranks each capability on its own leaderboard, so a position is only comparable between two models within the same row.

    Wan 2.6 Image to Video

    • Image to video#42

    Hailuo 2.3 Standard

    Not on a Versely leaderboard yet.

    More comparisons

    Frequently asked questions

    Which is cheaper, Wan 2.6 Image to Video or Hailuo 2.3 Standard?+

    Wan 2.6 Image to Video is cheaper per job: 20-90 credits against 23-45 credits for Hailuo 2.3 Standard.

    What can Wan 2.6 Image to Video do that Hailuo 2.3 Standard can't, or vice versa?+

    Only Wan 2.6 Image to Video lists high quality, audio support, prompt expansion, multi resolution, state of the art. Only Hailuo 2.3 Standard lists text to video, standard, reliable, efficient. Both list image to video, image to video.

    How do Wan 2.6 Image to Video and Hailuo 2.3 Standard bill?+

    Wan 2.6 Image to Video bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and its price moves with output resolution. Hailuo 2.3 Standard bills in tiers, and its price moves with clip length. Both are charged in Versely credits.

    How long a clip can Wan 2.6 Image to Video and Hailuo 2.3 Standard generate?+

    Wan 2.6 Image to Video supports 5s, 10s, 15s; Hailuo 2.3 Standard supports 6s, 10s.

    Try both inside Versely

    The all-in-one AI studio for creators. 60+ models for video, image, voice, music and lipsync — in your browser or on your phone.