Which should you pick?
Wan Video 2.5 Text to Video and LTX 2.3 Text to Video Fast start at the same 20 credits for a complete generation.
At their most expensive settings the gap widens: LTX 2.3 Text to Video Fast tops out at 256 credits a job versus 120, driven by output resolution.
LTX 2.3 Text to Video Fast supports up to 4K, the higher of the two.
Wan Video 2.5 Text to Video holds the stronger leaderboard position (#40 in text to video against #44 in text to video). Those are two different leaderboards unless the category matches — Versely ranks each capability separately.
Wan Video 2.5 Text to Video supports more aspect ratios (3: 16:9, 9:16, 1:1), giving it more format flexibility.
What a job costs
Wan Video 2.5 Text to Video
20-120 credits
It bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and the price moves with output resolution.
- SD4 credits
- HD8 credits
- 4K12 credits
LTX 2.3 Text to Video Fast
20-256 credits
It bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and the price moves with output resolution.
- SD/HD4 credits
- 4K13 credits
All figures are Versely credits. Your plan's credit allowance is on the pricing page.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Wan Video 2.5 Text to Video | LTX 2.3 Text to Video Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Wan | LTX |
| Cost per job | 20-120 credits | 20-256 credits |
| Billing | per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution | per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution |
| Max resolution | 1080p | 4K |
| Aspect ratios | 16:9, 9:16, 1:1 | 16:9, 9:16 |
| Durations | 5s, 10s | 6s, 8s, 10s, 12s, 14s, 16s, 18s, 20s |
| Frame rates | 24fps, 30fps, 60fps | — |
| Qualities | 480p, 720p, 1080p | 1080p, 1440p, 2160p |
| Requires starting image | No | No |
| Accepts video input | No | No |
| Reference images | — | — |
| Leaderboard | #40 in text to video | #44 in text to video |
| Released | Sep 24, 2025 | Mar 5, 2026 |
What each one does that the other doesn't
Only Wan Video 2.5 Text to Video
professional
Only LTX 2.3 Text to Video Fast
fast, text driven, multi resolution, audio generation
Both list: text to video, high quality, text to video.
Leaderboard positions
Versely ranks each capability on its own leaderboard, so a position is only comparable between two models within the same row.
Wan Video 2.5 Text to Video
- Text to video#40
LTX 2.3 Text to Video Fast
- Text to video#44
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Wan Video 2.5 Text to Video or LTX 2.3 Text to Video Fast?+
Neither — both start at 20 credits for a complete generation on Versely.
What can Wan Video 2.5 Text to Video do that LTX 2.3 Text to Video Fast can't, or vice versa?+
Only Wan Video 2.5 Text to Video lists professional. Only LTX 2.3 Text to Video Fast lists fast, text driven, multi resolution, audio generation. Both list text to video, high quality, text to video.
How do Wan Video 2.5 Text to Video and LTX 2.3 Text to Video Fast bill?+
Wan Video 2.5 Text to Video bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and its price moves with output resolution. LTX 2.3 Text to Video Fast bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and its price moves with output resolution. Both are charged in Versely credits.
Which has higher output resolution, Wan Video 2.5 Text to Video or LTX 2.3 Text to Video Fast?+
LTX 2.3 Text to Video Fast supports higher output (4K against 1080p).
Which ranks higher, Wan Video 2.5 Text to Video or LTX 2.3 Text to Video Fast?+
Wan Video 2.5 Text to Video sits at #40 in text to video and LTX 2.3 Text to Video Fast at #44 in text to video on Versely's live model rankings. Versely ranks each capability on its own leaderboard, so those positions are only a direct comparison when the category is the same.
Try both inside Versely
The all-in-one AI studio for creators. 60+ models for video, image, voice, music and lipsync — in your browser or on your phone.
Free account. Works in your browser - no install needed. The same account signs in on your phone.