Which should you pick?
Wan 2.6 Image to Video Flash is the cheaper job: 20-90 credits against 28-88 credits for Midjourney V7 Image to Video. Those are the credits one complete generation costs, not a headline rate, so they are directly comparable even though the two models bill differently.
At their most expensive settings the gap widens: Wan 2.6 Image to Video Flash tops out at 90 credits a job versus 88, driven by output resolution.
Wan 2.6 Image to Video Flash supports up to 1080p, the higher of the two.
What a job costs
Wan 2.6 Image to Video Flash
20-90 credits
It bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and the price moves with output resolution.
- SD/HD4 credits
- 4K6 credits
Midjourney V7 Image to Video
28-88 credits
It bills a flat rate that changes with output resolution, and the price moves with output resolution.
- SD28 credits
- HD/4K88 credits
All figures are Versely credits. Your plan's credit allowance is on the pricing page.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Wan 2.6 Image to Video Flash | Midjourney V7 Image to Video |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Wan | Midjourney |
| Cost per job | 20-90 credits | 28-88 credits |
| Billing | per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution | a flat rate that changes with output resolution |
| Max resolution | 1080p | 720p |
| Aspect ratios | — | — |
| Durations | 5s, 10s, 15s | — |
| Frame rates | — | — |
| Qualities | 720p, 1080p | 480p, 720p |
| Requires starting image | Yes | Yes |
| Accepts video input | No | No |
| Reference images | — | — |
| Leaderboard | Unranked | #53 in image to video |
| Released | Dec 15, 2025 | May 31, 2025 |
What each one does that the other doesn't
Only Wan 2.6 Image to Video Flash
ultra fast, efficient
Only Midjourney V7 Image to Video
cinematic, high quality
Both list: image to video, image to video.
Leaderboard positions
Versely ranks each capability on its own leaderboard, so a position is only comparable between two models within the same row.
Wan 2.6 Image to Video Flash
Not on a Versely leaderboard yet.
Midjourney V7 Image to Video
- Image to video#53
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Wan 2.6 Image to Video Flash or Midjourney V7 Image to Video?+
Wan 2.6 Image to Video Flash is cheaper per job: 20-90 credits against 28-88 credits for Midjourney V7 Image to Video.
What can Wan 2.6 Image to Video Flash do that Midjourney V7 Image to Video can't, or vice versa?+
Only Wan 2.6 Image to Video Flash lists ultra fast, efficient. Only Midjourney V7 Image to Video lists cinematic, high quality. Both list image to video, image to video.
How do Wan 2.6 Image to Video Flash and Midjourney V7 Image to Video bill?+
Wan 2.6 Image to Video Flash bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and its price moves with output resolution. Midjourney V7 Image to Video bills a flat rate that changes with output resolution, and its price moves with output resolution. Both are charged in Versely credits.
Which has higher output resolution, Wan 2.6 Image to Video Flash or Midjourney V7 Image to Video?+
Wan 2.6 Image to Video Flash supports higher output (1080p against 720p).
Try both inside Versely
The all-in-one AI studio for creators. 60+ models for video, image, voice, music and lipsync — in your browser or on your phone.
Free account. Works in your browser - no install needed. The same account signs in on your phone.