Video models · Pixverse vs Wan

    Pixverse V6 Text to Video vs Wan 3.0 Text to Video

    Pixverse V6 Text to Video runs 10-58 credits a job, Wan 3.0 Text to Video runs 8-240 credits.

    Which should you pick?

    Wan 3.0 Text to Video is the cheaper job: 8-240 credits against 10-58 credits for Pixverse V6 Text to Video. Those are the credits one complete generation costs, not a headline rate, so they are directly comparable even though the two models bill differently.

    At their most expensive settings the gap widens: Wan 3.0 Text to Video tops out at 240 credits a job versus 58, driven by output resolution.

    Pixverse V6 Text to Video supports more aspect ratios (8: 16:9, 4:3, 1:1, 3:4, 9:16, 2:3, 3:2, 21:9), giving it more format flexibility.

    What a job costs

    Pixverse V6 Text to Video

    10-58 credits

    It bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and the price moves with output resolution.

    • SD2 credits
    • HD4 credits
    • 4K8 credits

    Wan 3.0 Text to Video

    8-240 credits

    It bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and the price moves with output resolution.

    • SD4 credits
    • HD8 credits
    • 4K16 credits

    All figures are Versely credits. Your plan's credit allowance is on the pricing page.

    Spec comparison

    SpecPixverse V6 Text to VideoWan 3.0 Text to Video
    ProviderPixverseWan
    Cost per job10-58 credits8-240 credits
    Billingper second, at a rate that changes with output resolutionper second, at a rate that changes with output resolution
    Max resolution1080p1080p
    Aspect ratios16:9, 4:3, 1:1, 3:4, 9:16, 2:3, 3:2, 21:916:9, 9:16, 1:1, 4:3, 3:4
    Durations5s, 8s2s, 3s, 4s, 5s, 6s, 7s, 8s, 9s, 10s, 11s, 12s, 13s, 14s, 15s
    Frame rates
    Qualities360p, 540p, 720p, 1080p480p, 720p, 1080p
    Requires starting imageNoNo
    Accepts video inputNoNo
    Reference images
    Leaderboard#20 in text to videoUnranked
    ReleasedMar 30, 2026Aug 24, 2026

    What each one does that the other doesn't

    Only Pixverse V6 Text to Video

    motion, audio, 1080p, pixverse

    Only Wan 3.0 Text to Video

    text driven, native audio, top ranked, prompt expansion, cinematic

    Both list: text to video, text to video.

    Leaderboard positions

    Versely ranks each capability on its own leaderboard, so a position is only comparable between two models within the same row.

    Pixverse V6 Text to Video

    • Text to video#20

    Wan 3.0 Text to Video

    Not on a Versely leaderboard yet.

    More comparisons

    Frequently asked questions

    Which is cheaper, Pixverse V6 Text to Video or Wan 3.0 Text to Video?+

    Wan 3.0 Text to Video is cheaper per job: 8-240 credits against 10-58 credits for Pixverse V6 Text to Video.

    What can Pixverse V6 Text to Video do that Wan 3.0 Text to Video can't, or vice versa?+

    Only Pixverse V6 Text to Video lists motion, audio, 1080p, pixverse. Only Wan 3.0 Text to Video lists text driven, native audio, top ranked, prompt expansion, cinematic. Both list text to video, text to video.

    How do Pixverse V6 Text to Video and Wan 3.0 Text to Video bill?+

    Pixverse V6 Text to Video bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and its price moves with output resolution. Wan 3.0 Text to Video bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and its price moves with output resolution. Both are charged in Versely credits.

    How long a clip can Pixverse V6 Text to Video and Wan 3.0 Text to Video generate?+

    Pixverse V6 Text to Video supports 5s, 8s; Wan 3.0 Text to Video supports 2s, 3s, 4s, 5s, 6s, 7s, 8s, 9s, 10s, 11s, 12s, 13s, 14s, 15s.

    Try both inside Versely

    The all-in-one AI studio for creators. 60+ models for video, image, voice, music and lipsync — in your browser or on your phone.