Video models · ByteDance vs Wan

    Seedance 2.5 vs Wan 2.7 Text to Video

    Seedance 2.5 runs 67-1114 credits a job, Wan 2.7 Text to Video runs 16-180 credits.

    Which should you pick?

    Wan 2.7 Text to Video is the cheaper job: 16-180 credits against 67-1114 credits for Seedance 2.5. Those are the credits one complete generation costs, not a headline rate, so they are directly comparable even though the two models bill differently.

    At their most expensive settings the gap widens: Seedance 2.5 tops out at 1114 credits a job versus 180, driven by output resolution.

    Wan 2.7 Text to Video supports up to 1080p, the higher of the two.

    Seedance 2.5 supports more aspect ratios (8: 21:9, 16:9, 4:3, 1:1, 3:4, 9:16, adaptive, auto), giving it more format flexibility.

    What a job costs

    Seedance 2.5

    67-1114 credits

    It bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and the price moves with output resolution.

    • SD17 credits
    • HD/4K38 credits

    Wan 2.7 Text to Video

    16-180 credits

    It bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and the price moves with output resolution.

    • SD/HD8 credits
    • 4K12 credits

    All figures are Versely credits. Your plan's credit allowance is on the pricing page.

    Spec comparison

    SpecSeedance 2.5Wan 2.7 Text to Video
    ProviderByteDanceWan
    Cost per job67-1114 credits16-180 credits
    Billingper second, at a rate that changes with output resolutionper second, at a rate that changes with output resolution
    Max resolution720p1080p
    Aspect ratios21:9, 16:9, 4:3, 1:1, 3:4, 9:16, adaptive, auto16:9, 9:16, 1:1, 4:3, 3:4
    Durations4s, 5s, 6s, 7s, 8s, 9s, 10s, 11s, 12s, 13s, 14s, 15s, 16s, 17s, 18s, 19s, 20s, 21s, 22s, 23s, 24s, 25s, 26s, 27s, 28s, 29s, 30s2s, 3s, 4s, 5s, 6s, 7s, 8s, 9s, 10s, 11s, 12s, 13s, 14s, 15s
    Frame rates
    Qualities480p, 720p720p, 1080p
    Requires starting imageNoNo
    Accepts video inputNoNo
    Reference images
    LeaderboardUnranked#7 in text to video
    ReleasedJul 31, 2026Apr 5, 2026

    What each one does that the other doesn't

    Only Seedance 2.5

    long form, single shot, cinematic, audio sync

    Only Wan 2.7 Text to Video

    high quality, audio input, prompt extend

    Both list: text to video, text to video.

    Leaderboard positions

    Versely ranks each capability on its own leaderboard, so a position is only comparable between two models within the same row.

    Seedance 2.5

    Not on a Versely leaderboard yet.

    Wan 2.7 Text to Video

    • Text to video#7

    More comparisons

    Frequently asked questions

    Which is cheaper, Seedance 2.5 or Wan 2.7 Text to Video?+

    Wan 2.7 Text to Video is cheaper per job: 16-180 credits against 67-1114 credits for Seedance 2.5.

    What can Seedance 2.5 do that Wan 2.7 Text to Video can't, or vice versa?+

    Only Seedance 2.5 lists long form, single shot, cinematic, audio sync. Only Wan 2.7 Text to Video lists high quality, audio input, prompt extend. Both list text to video, text to video.

    How do Seedance 2.5 and Wan 2.7 Text to Video bill?+

    Seedance 2.5 bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and its price moves with output resolution. Wan 2.7 Text to Video bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and its price moves with output resolution. Both are charged in Versely credits.

    Which has higher output resolution, Seedance 2.5 or Wan 2.7 Text to Video?+

    Wan 2.7 Text to Video supports higher output (1080p against 720p).

    How long a clip can Seedance 2.5 and Wan 2.7 Text to Video generate?+

    Seedance 2.5 supports 4s, 5s, 6s, 7s, 8s, 9s, 10s, 11s, 12s, 13s, 14s, 15s, 16s, 17s, 18s, 19s, 20s, 21s, 22s, 23s, 24s, 25s, 26s, 27s, 28s, 29s, 30s; Wan 2.7 Text to Video supports 2s, 3s, 4s, 5s, 6s, 7s, 8s, 9s, 10s, 11s, 12s, 13s, 14s, 15s.

    Try both inside Versely

    The all-in-one AI studio for creators. 60+ models for video, image, voice, music and lipsync — in your browser or on your phone.