Video models · Wan vs NVIDIA

    Wan 2.1 Image to Video vs Cosmos 3 Super Image to Video

    Wan 2.1 Image to Video runs 8-40 credits a job, Cosmos 3 Super Image to Video runs 8-28 credits.

    Which should you pick?

    Wan 2.1 Image to Video and Cosmos 3 Super Image to Video start at the same 8 credits for a complete generation.

    At their most expensive settings the gap widens: Wan 2.1 Image to Video tops out at 40 credits a job versus 28, driven by output resolution.

    Wan 2.1 Image to Video supports up to 1080p, the higher of the two.

    Cosmos 3 Super Image to Video holds the stronger leaderboard position (#20 in image to video against #75 in image to video). Those are two different leaderboards unless the category matches — Versely ranks each capability separately.

    Cosmos 3 Super Image to Video supports more aspect ratios (5: 16:9, 9:16, 1:1, 4:3, 3:4), giving it more format flexibility.

    What a job costs

    Wan 2.1 Image to Video

    8-40 credits

    It bills by output resolution, audio and clip length, and the price moves with output resolution.

    • 480p8 credits
    • 720p16 credits
    • 1080p32 credits

    Cosmos 3 Super Image to Video

    8-28 credits

    It bills per second of output, and the price moves with clip length.

    • Price4 credits

    All figures are Versely credits. Your plan's credit allowance is on the pricing page.

    Spec comparison

    SpecWan 2.1 Image to VideoCosmos 3 Super Image to Video
    ProviderWanNVIDIA
    Cost per job8-40 credits8-28 credits
    Billingby output resolution, audio and clip lengthper second of output
    Max resolution1080p720p
    Aspect ratios—16:9, 9:16, 1:1, 4:3, 3:4
    Durations5s, 10s, 15s2s, 3s, 4s, 5s, 6s, 7s
    Frame rates——
    Qualities480p, 720p, 1080p480p, 720p
    Requires starting imageYesYes
    Accepts video inputNoNo
    Reference images——
    Leaderboard#75 in image to video#20 in image to video
    ReleasedFeb 25, 2025Aug 1, 2026

    What each one does that the other doesn't

    Only Wan 2.1 Image to Video

    Nothing the other one doesn't also list.

    Only Cosmos 3 Super Image to Video

    image driven, physics, prompt expansion, value, top ranked

    Both list: image to video.

    Leaderboard positions

    Versely ranks each capability on its own leaderboard, so a position is only comparable between two models within the same row.

    Wan 2.1 Image to Video

    • Image to video#75

    Cosmos 3 Super Image to Video

    • Image to video#20

    More comparisons

    Frequently asked questions

    Which is cheaper, Wan 2.1 Image to Video or Cosmos 3 Super Image to Video?+

    Neither — both start at 8 credits for a complete generation on Versely.

    What can Wan 2.1 Image to Video do that Cosmos 3 Super Image to Video can't, or vice versa?+

    Only Cosmos 3 Super Image to Video lists image driven, physics, prompt expansion, value, top ranked. Both list image to video.

    How do Wan 2.1 Image to Video and Cosmos 3 Super Image to Video bill?+

    Wan 2.1 Image to Video bills by output resolution, audio and clip length, and its price moves with output resolution. Cosmos 3 Super Image to Video bills per second of output, and its price moves with clip length. Both are charged in Versely credits.

    Which has higher output resolution, Wan 2.1 Image to Video or Cosmos 3 Super Image to Video?+

    Wan 2.1 Image to Video supports higher output (1080p against 720p).

    Which ranks higher, Wan 2.1 Image to Video or Cosmos 3 Super Image to Video?+

    Wan 2.1 Image to Video sits at #75 in image to video and Cosmos 3 Super Image to Video at #20 in image to video on Versely's live model rankings. Versely ranks each capability on its own leaderboard, so those positions are only a direct comparison when the category is the same.

    Try both inside Versely

    The all-in-one AI studio for creators. 60+ models for video, image, voice, music and lipsync, in your browser or on your phone.

    Free on the web and on iPhone, one account.