Image models · Grok vs Kling

    Grok Imagine Image 2.0 vs Kling Image 3.0

    Grok Imagine Image 2.0 runs 2-3 credits a job, Kling Image 3.0 runs 3 credits.

    Which should you pick?

    Grok Imagine Image 2.0 is the cheaper job: 2-3 credits against 3 credits for Kling Image 3.0. Those are the credits one complete generation costs, not a headline rate, so they are directly comparable even though the two models bill differently.

    Grok Imagine Image 2.0 holds the stronger leaderboard position (#5 in text to image against #49 in edit image). Those are two different leaderboards unless the category matches — Versely ranks each capability separately.

    Grok Imagine Image 2.0 supports more aspect ratios (13: 2:1, 20:9, 19.5:9, 16:9, 4:3, 3:2, 1:1, 2:3, 3:4, 9:16, 9:19.5, 9:20, 1:2), giving it more format flexibility.

    What a job costs

    Grok Imagine Image 2.0

    2-3 credits

    It bills a flat rate that changes with output resolution, and the price moves with output resolution.

    • SD/HD2 credits
    • 4K3 credits

    Kling Image 3.0

    3 credits

    It bills a flat rate per generation.

    • Price3 credits

    All figures are Versely credits. Your plan's credit allowance is on the pricing page.

    Spec comparison

    SpecGrok Imagine Image 2.0Kling Image 3.0
    ProviderGrokKling
    Cost per job2-3 credits3 credits
    Billinga flat rate that changes with output resolutiona flat rate per generation
    Max resolution2K2K
    Aspect ratios2:1, 20:9, 19.5:9, 16:9, 4:3, 3:2, 1:1, 2:3, 3:4, 9:16, 9:19.5, 9:20, 1:216:9, 9:16, 1:1, 4:3, 3:4, 3:2, 2:3, 21:9
    Durations——
    Frame rates——
    Qualities1K, 2K1K, 2K
    Requires starting imageNoNo
    Accepts video inputNoNo
    Reference images——
    Leaderboard#5 in text to image#49 in edit image
    ReleasedAug 24, 2026Feb 5, 2026

    What each one does that the other doesn't

    Only Grok Imagine Image 2.0

    wide aspect range, 2k, batch

    Only Kling Image 3.0

    photorealistic, artistic

    Both list: text to image, text to image.

    Leaderboard positions

    Versely ranks each capability on its own leaderboard, so a position is only comparable between two models within the same row.

    Grok Imagine Image 2.0

    • Text to image#5
    • Edit image#9

    Kling Image 3.0

    • Edit image#49
    • Text to image#93

    Frequently asked questions

    Which is cheaper, Grok Imagine Image 2.0 or Kling Image 3.0?+

    Grok Imagine Image 2.0 is cheaper per job: 2-3 credits against 3 credits for Kling Image 3.0.

    What can Grok Imagine Image 2.0 do that Kling Image 3.0 can't, or vice versa?+

    Only Grok Imagine Image 2.0 lists wide aspect range, 2k, batch. Only Kling Image 3.0 lists photorealistic, artistic. Both list text to image, text to image.

    How do Grok Imagine Image 2.0 and Kling Image 3.0 bill?+

    Grok Imagine Image 2.0 bills a flat rate that changes with output resolution, and its price moves with output resolution. Kling Image 3.0 bills a flat rate per generation. Both are charged in Versely credits.

    Which ranks higher, Grok Imagine Image 2.0 or Kling Image 3.0?+

    Grok Imagine Image 2.0 sits at #5 in text to image and Kling Image 3.0 at #49 in edit image on Versely's live model rankings. Versely ranks each capability on its own leaderboard, so those positions are only a direct comparison when the category is the same.

    Try both inside Versely

    The all-in-one AI studio for creators. 60+ models for video, image, voice, music and lipsync, in your browser or on your phone.