No filming:An AI avatar or clone yourself

    Video models · Wan vs Grok

    Wan 3.0 Prime Text to Video vs Grok Imagine Video

    Wan 3.0 Prime Text to Video runs 11-336 credits a job, Grok Imagine Video runs 12-84 credits.

    Which should you pick?

    Wan 3.0 Prime Text to Video is the cheaper job: 11-336 credits against 12-84 credits for Grok Imagine Video. Those are the credits one complete generation costs, not a headline rate, so they are directly comparable even though the two models bill differently.

    At their most expensive settings the gap widens: Wan 3.0 Prime Text to Video tops out at 336 credits a job versus 84, driven by output resolution.

    Grok Imagine Video supports more aspect ratios (7: 16:9, 3:2, 4:3, 1:1, 3:4, 2:3, 9:16), giving it more format flexibility.

    What a job costs

    Wan 3.0 Prime Text to Video

    11-336 credits

    It bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and the price moves with output resolution.

    • SD6 credits
    • HD12 credits
    • 4K23 credits

    Grok Imagine Video

    12-84 credits

    It bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and the price moves with output resolution.

    • SD2 credits
    • HD/4K3 credits

    All figures are Versely credits. Your plan's credit allowance is on the pricing page.

    Spec comparison

    SpecWan 3.0 Prime Text to VideoGrok Imagine Video
    ProviderWanGrok
    Cost per job11-336 credits12-84 credits
    Billingper second, at a rate that changes with output resolutionper second, at a rate that changes with output resolution
    Max resolution1080p1080p
    Aspect ratios16:9, 9:16, 1:1, 4:3, 3:416:9, 3:2, 4:3, 1:1, 3:4, 2:3, 9:16
    Durations2s, 3s, 4s, 5s, 6s, 7s, 8s, 9s, 10s, 11s, 12s, 13s, 14s, 15s6s, 10s, 15s, 20s, 30s
    Frame rates——
    Qualities480p, 720p, 1080p1080p, 480p, 720p
    Requires starting imageNoNo
    Accepts video inputNoNo
    Reference images——
    LeaderboardUnrankedUnranked
    ReleasedAug 24, 2026Jul 28, 2025

    What each one does that the other doesn't

    Only Wan 3.0 Prime Text to Video

    text driven, native audio, fast, prompt expansion, cinematic

    Only Grok Imagine Video

    innovative, image to video, smart

    Both list: text to video.

    More comparisons

    Frequently asked questions

    Which is cheaper, Wan 3.0 Prime Text to Video or Grok Imagine Video?+

    Wan 3.0 Prime Text to Video is cheaper per job: 11-336 credits against 12-84 credits for Grok Imagine Video.

    What can Wan 3.0 Prime Text to Video do that Grok Imagine Video can't, or vice versa?+

    Only Wan 3.0 Prime Text to Video lists text driven, native audio, fast, prompt expansion, cinematic. Only Grok Imagine Video lists innovative, image to video, smart. Both list text to video.

    How do Wan 3.0 Prime Text to Video and Grok Imagine Video bill?+

    Wan 3.0 Prime Text to Video bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and its price moves with output resolution. Grok Imagine Video bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and its price moves with output resolution. Both are charged in Versely credits.

    How long a clip can Wan 3.0 Prime Text to Video and Grok Imagine Video generate?+

    Wan 3.0 Prime Text to Video supports 2s, 3s, 4s, 5s, 6s, 7s, 8s, 9s, 10s, 11s, 12s, 13s, 14s, 15s; Grok Imagine Video supports 6s, 10s, 15s, 20s, 30s.

    Try both inside Versely

    The all-in-one AI studio for creators. 60+ models for video, image, voice, music and lipsync, in your browser or on your phone.

    Free on the web and on iPhone, one account.