Video models · Wan vs Kling

    Wan 3.0 Text to Video vs Kling 2.5 Turbo

    Wan 3.0 Text to Video runs 6-168 credits a job, Kling 2.5 Turbo runs 17-34 credits.

    Which should you pick?

    Wan 3.0 Text to Video is the cheaper job: 6-168 credits against 17-34 credits for Kling 2.5 Turbo. Those are the credits one complete generation costs, not a headline rate, so they are directly comparable even though the two models bill differently.

    At their most expensive settings the gap widens: Wan 3.0 Text to Video tops out at 168 credits a job versus 34, driven by output resolution.

    Wan 3.0 Text to Video holds the stronger leaderboard position (#1 in text to video against #11 in image to video). Those are two different leaderboards unless the category matches — Versely ranks each capability separately.

    Wan 3.0 Text to Video supports more aspect ratios (5: 16:9, 9:16, 1:1, 4:3, 3:4), giving it more format flexibility.

    What a job costs

    Wan 3.0 Text to Video

    6-168 credits

    It bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and the price moves with output resolution.

    • SD3 credits
    • HD6 credits
    • 4K12 credits

    Kling 2.5 Turbo

    17-34 credits

    It bills a base charge plus a per-second rate, and the price moves with clip length.

    • First 5s17 credits
    • Each extra second4 credits

    All figures are Versely credits. Your plan's credit allowance is on the pricing page.

    Spec comparison

    SpecWan 3.0 Text to VideoKling 2.5 Turbo
    ProviderWanKling
    Cost per job6-168 credits17-34 credits
    Billingper second, at a rate that changes with output resolutiona base charge plus a per-second rate
    Max resolution1080p1080p
    Aspect ratios16:9, 9:16, 1:1, 4:3, 3:416:9, 9:16, 1:1
    Durations2s, 3s, 4s, 5s, 6s, 7s, 8s, 9s, 10s, 11s, 12s, 13s, 14s, 15s5s, 10s
    Frame rates—24fps, 30fps, 60fps
    Qualities480p, 720p, 1080p1080p
    Requires starting imageNoNo
    Accepts video inputNoNo
    Reference images——
    Leaderboard#1 in text to video#11 in image to video
    ReleasedAug 24, 2026Sep 23, 2025

    What each one does that the other doesn't

    Only Wan 3.0 Text to Video

    text driven, native audio, top ranked, prompt expansion, cinematic

    Only Kling 2.5 Turbo

    turbo, efficient, quality

    Both list: text to video.

    Leaderboard positions

    Versely ranks each capability on its own leaderboard, so a position is only comparable between two models within the same row.

    Wan 3.0 Text to Video

    • Text to video#1

    Kling 2.5 Turbo

    • Image to video#11

    More comparisons

    Frequently asked questions

    Which is cheaper, Wan 3.0 Text to Video or Kling 2.5 Turbo?+

    Wan 3.0 Text to Video is cheaper per job: 6-168 credits against 17-34 credits for Kling 2.5 Turbo.

    What can Wan 3.0 Text to Video do that Kling 2.5 Turbo can't, or vice versa?+

    Only Wan 3.0 Text to Video lists text driven, native audio, top ranked, prompt expansion, cinematic. Only Kling 2.5 Turbo lists turbo, efficient, quality. Both list text to video.

    How do Wan 3.0 Text to Video and Kling 2.5 Turbo bill?+

    Wan 3.0 Text to Video bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and its price moves with output resolution. Kling 2.5 Turbo bills a base charge plus a per-second rate, and its price moves with clip length. Both are charged in Versely credits.

    Which ranks higher, Wan 3.0 Text to Video or Kling 2.5 Turbo?+

    Wan 3.0 Text to Video sits at #1 in text to video and Kling 2.5 Turbo at #11 in image to video on Versely's live model rankings. Versely ranks each capability on its own leaderboard, so those positions are only a direct comparison when the category is the same.

    How long a clip can Wan 3.0 Text to Video and Kling 2.5 Turbo generate?+

    Wan 3.0 Text to Video supports 2s, 3s, 4s, 5s, 6s, 7s, 8s, 9s, 10s, 11s, 12s, 13s, 14s, 15s; Kling 2.5 Turbo supports 5s, 10s.

    Try both inside Versely

    The all-in-one AI studio for creators. 60+ models for video, image, voice, music and lipsync, in your browser or on your phone.