Which should you pick?
Luma Ray 2 720p is the cheaper job: 40-80 credits against 58-136 credits for LTX 2.5 Text to Video Pro. Those are the credits one complete generation costs, not a headline rate, so they are directly comparable even though the two models bill differently.
At their most expensive settings the gap widens: LTX 2.5 Text to Video Pro tops out at 136 credits a job versus 80, driven by output resolution.
LTX 2.5 Text to Video Pro supports up to 1080p, the higher of the two.
LTX 2.5 Text to Video Pro holds the stronger leaderboard position (#23 in text to video against #43 in image to video). Those are two different leaderboards unless the category matches — Versely ranks each capability separately.
Luma Ray 2 720p supports more aspect ratios (7: 1:1, 3:4, 4:3, 9:16, 16:9, 9:21, 21:9), giving it more format flexibility.
What a job costs
Luma Ray 2 720p
40-80 credits
It bills per 5 seconds of output, and the price moves with clip length.
- Price40 credits
LTX 2.5 Text to Video Pro
58-136 credits
It bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and the price moves with output resolution.
- SD/HD10 credits
- 4K14 credits
All figures are Versely credits. Your plan's credit allowance is on the pricing page.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Luma Ray 2 720p | LTX 2.5 Text to Video Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Luma | LTX |
| Cost per job | 40-80 credits | 58-136 credits |
| Billing | per 5 seconds of output | per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution |
| Max resolution | 720p | 1080p |
| Aspect ratios | 1:1, 3:4, 4:3, 9:16, 16:9, 9:21, 21:9 | 16:9, 9:16 |
| Durations | 5s, 9s | 6s, 8s, 10s |
| Frame rates | 24fps, 30fps | 24, 25, 50 |
| Qualities | 720p | 720p, 1080p |
| Requires starting image | No | No |
| Accepts video input | No | No |
| Reference images | — | — |
| Leaderboard | #43 in image to video | #23 in text to video |
| Released | Jan 15, 2025 | Aug 24, 2026 |
What each one does that the other doesn't
Only Luma Ray 2 720p
720p, luma, ray
Only LTX 2.5 Text to Video Pro
pro, text driven, native audio, high fidelity, camera motion
Both list: text to video.
Leaderboard positions
Versely ranks each capability on its own leaderboard, so a position is only comparable between two models within the same row.
Luma Ray 2 720p
- Image to video#43
LTX 2.5 Text to Video Pro
- Text to video#23
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Luma Ray 2 720p or LTX 2.5 Text to Video Pro?+
Luma Ray 2 720p is cheaper per job: 40-80 credits against 58-136 credits for LTX 2.5 Text to Video Pro.
What can Luma Ray 2 720p do that LTX 2.5 Text to Video Pro can't, or vice versa?+
Only Luma Ray 2 720p lists 720p, luma, ray. Only LTX 2.5 Text to Video Pro lists pro, text driven, native audio, high fidelity, camera motion. Both list text to video.
How do Luma Ray 2 720p and LTX 2.5 Text to Video Pro bill?+
Luma Ray 2 720p bills per 5 seconds of output, and its price moves with clip length. LTX 2.5 Text to Video Pro bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and its price moves with output resolution. Both are charged in Versely credits.
Which has higher output resolution, Luma Ray 2 720p or LTX 2.5 Text to Video Pro?+
LTX 2.5 Text to Video Pro supports higher output (1080p against 720p).
Which ranks higher, Luma Ray 2 720p or LTX 2.5 Text to Video Pro?+
Luma Ray 2 720p sits at #43 in image to video and LTX 2.5 Text to Video Pro at #23 in text to video on Versely's live model rankings. Versely ranks each capability on its own leaderboard, so those positions are only a direct comparison when the category is the same.
Try both inside Versely
The all-in-one AI studio for creators. 60+ models for video, image, voice, music and lipsync, in your browser or on your phone.
Free on iPhone. On a computer? The same account works on Versely Web, no install needed.