Lipsync models · Wan vs LTX

    Wan 2.2 Speech to Video vs LTX 2 Audio to Video

    Wan 2.2 Speech to Video runs 50-2400 credits a job, LTX 2 Audio to Video runs 20 credits.

    Which should you pick?

    LTX 2 Audio to Video is the cheaper job: 20 credits against 50-2400 credits for Wan 2.2 Speech to Video. Those are the credits one complete generation costs, not a headline rate, so they are directly comparable even though the two models bill differently.

    At their most expensive settings the gap widens: Wan 2.2 Speech to Video tops out at 2400 credits a job versus 20, driven by output resolution.

    Wan 2.2 Speech to Video requires a starting image; LTX 2 Audio to Video can generate from a text prompt alone.

    What a job costs

    Wan 2.2 Speech to Video

    50-2400 credits

    It bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and the price moves with output resolution.

    • SD10 credits
    • HD/4K20 credits

    LTX 2 Audio to Video

    20 credits

    It bills a flat rate per generation.

    • Price20 credits

    All figures are Versely credits. Your plan's credit allowance is on the pricing page.

    Spec comparison

    SpecWan 2.2 Speech to VideoLTX 2 Audio to Video
    ProviderWanLTX
    Cost per job50-2400 credits20 credits
    Billingper second, at a rate that changes with output resolutiona flat rate per generation
    Max resolution720p
    Aspect ratios
    Durations
    Frame rates
    Qualities480p, 580p, 720p
    Requires starting imageYesNo
    Accepts video inputNoNo
    Reference images
    LeaderboardUnrankedUnranked
    ReleasedAug 27, 2025Jan 6, 2026

    What each one does that the other doesn't

    Only Wan 2.2 Speech to Video

    image to lipsync, realistic, high quality, talking head, facial expressions, body movements, professional

    Only LTX 2 Audio to Video

    audio to video, audio visualization, music video

    Both list: audio to lipsync.

    Frequently asked questions

    Which is cheaper, Wan 2.2 Speech to Video or LTX 2 Audio to Video?+

    LTX 2 Audio to Video is cheaper per job: 20 credits against 50-2400 credits for Wan 2.2 Speech to Video.

    What can Wan 2.2 Speech to Video do that LTX 2 Audio to Video can't, or vice versa?+

    Only Wan 2.2 Speech to Video lists image to lipsync, realistic, high quality, talking head, facial expressions, body movements, professional. Only LTX 2 Audio to Video lists audio to video, audio visualization, music video. Both list audio to lipsync.

    How do Wan 2.2 Speech to Video and LTX 2 Audio to Video bill?+

    Wan 2.2 Speech to Video bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and its price moves with output resolution. LTX 2 Audio to Video bills a flat rate per generation. Both are charged in Versely credits.

    Try both inside Versely

    The all-in-one AI studio for creators. 60+ models for video, image, voice, music and lipsync in a single app.