No filming:An AI avatar or clone yourself

    Video models · Luma vs Runway

    Luma Ray 3.2 vs Runway Text to Video

    Luma Ray 3.2 runs 40-320 credits a job, Runway Text to Video runs 36-72 credits.

    Which should you pick?

    Runway Text to Video is the cheaper job: 36-72 credits against 40-320 credits for Luma Ray 3.2. Those are the credits one complete generation costs, not a headline rate, so they are directly comparable even though the two models bill differently.

    At their most expensive settings the gap widens: Luma Ray 3.2 tops out at 320 credits a job versus 72, driven by output resolution.

    Luma Ray 3.2 supports more aspect ratios (6: 16:9, 9:16, 1:1, 4:3, 3:4, 21:9), giving it more format flexibility.

    What a job costs

    Luma Ray 3.2

    40-320 credits

    It bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and the price moves with output resolution.

    • SD8 credits
    • HD16 credits
    • 4K32 credits

    Runway Text to Video

    36-72 credits

    It bills per second of output, and the price moves with clip length.

    • Price8 credits

    All figures are Versely credits. Your plan's credit allowance is on the pricing page.

    Spec comparison

    SpecLuma Ray 3.2Runway Text to Video
    ProviderLumaRunway
    Cost per job40-320 credits36-72 credits
    Billingper second, at a rate that changes with output resolutionper second of output
    Max resolution1080p1080p
    Aspect ratios16:9, 9:16, 1:1, 4:3, 3:4, 21:916:9, 4:3, 1:1, 3:4, 9:16
    Durations5s, 10s5s, 10s
    Frame rates——
    Qualities540p, 720p, 1080p720p, 1080p
    Requires starting imageNoNo
    Accepts video inputNoNo
    Reference images——
    LeaderboardUnrankedUnranked
    ReleasedJun 9, 2026Mar 31, 2025

    What each one does that the other doesn't

    Only Luma Ray 3.2

    up to 10s, cinematic motion, up to 1080p

    Only Runway Text to Video

    Nothing the other one doesn't also list.

    Both list: text to video, text to video.

    Frequently asked questions

    Which is cheaper, Luma Ray 3.2 or Runway Text to Video?+

    Runway Text to Video is cheaper per job: 36-72 credits against 40-320 credits for Luma Ray 3.2.

    What can Luma Ray 3.2 do that Runway Text to Video can't, or vice versa?+

    Only Luma Ray 3.2 lists up to 10s, cinematic motion, up to 1080p. Both list text to video, text to video.

    How do Luma Ray 3.2 and Runway Text to Video bill?+

    Luma Ray 3.2 bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and its price moves with output resolution. Runway Text to Video bills per second of output, and its price moves with clip length. Both are charged in Versely credits.

    How long a clip can Luma Ray 3.2 and Runway Text to Video generate?+

    Luma Ray 3.2 supports 5s, 10s; Runway Text to Video supports 5s, 10s.

    Try both inside Versely

    The all-in-one AI studio for creators. 60+ models for video, image, voice, music and lipsync, in your browser or on your phone.

    Free on the web and on iPhone, one account.