Video models · Wan vs Pixverse

    Wan 3.0 Prime Text to Video vs Pixverse Text to Video

    Wan 3.0 Prime Text to Video runs 11-336 credits a job, Pixverse Text to Video runs 12-64 credits.

    Which should you pick?

    Wan 3.0 Prime Text to Video is the cheaper job: 11-336 credits against 12-64 credits for Pixverse Text to Video. Those are the credits one complete generation costs, not a headline rate, so they are directly comparable even though the two models bill differently.

    At their most expensive settings the gap widens: Wan 3.0 Prime Text to Video tops out at 336 credits a job versus 64, driven by output resolution.

    What a job costs

    Wan 3.0 Prime Text to Video

    11-336 credits

    It bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and the price moves with output resolution.

    • SD6 credits
    • HD12 credits
    • 4K23 credits

    Pixverse Text to Video

    12-64 credits

    It bills by output resolution, audio and clip length, and the price moves with output resolution.

    • 360p12 credits
    • 540p12 credits
    • 720p16 credits
    • 1080p32 credits

    All figures are Versely credits. Your plan's credit allowance is on the pricing page.

    Spec comparison

    SpecWan 3.0 Prime Text to VideoPixverse Text to Video
    ProviderWanPixverse
    Cost per job11-336 credits12-64 credits
    Billingper second, at a rate that changes with output resolutionby output resolution, audio and clip length
    Max resolution1080p1080p
    Aspect ratios16:9, 9:16, 1:1, 4:3, 3:416:9, 9:16, 1:1, 4:3, 3:4
    Durations2s, 3s, 4s, 5s, 6s, 7s, 8s, 9s, 10s, 11s, 12s, 13s, 14s, 15s5s, 8s, 10s
    Frame rates—24fps, 30fps
    Qualities480p, 720p, 1080p360p, 540p, 720p, 1080p
    Requires starting imageNoNo
    Accepts video inputNoNo
    Reference images——
    LeaderboardUnrankedUnranked
    ReleasedAug 24, 2026Mar 30, 2026

    What each one does that the other doesn't

    Only Wan 3.0 Prime Text to Video

    text driven, native audio, fast, prompt expansion, cinematic

    Only Pixverse Text to Video

    v5.5, creative

    Both list: text to video.

    Frequently asked questions

    Which is cheaper, Wan 3.0 Prime Text to Video or Pixverse Text to Video?+

    Wan 3.0 Prime Text to Video is cheaper per job: 11-336 credits against 12-64 credits for Pixverse Text to Video.

    What can Wan 3.0 Prime Text to Video do that Pixverse Text to Video can't, or vice versa?+

    Only Wan 3.0 Prime Text to Video lists text driven, native audio, fast, prompt expansion, cinematic. Only Pixverse Text to Video lists v5.5, creative. Both list text to video.

    How do Wan 3.0 Prime Text to Video and Pixverse Text to Video bill?+

    Wan 3.0 Prime Text to Video bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and its price moves with output resolution. Pixverse Text to Video bills by output resolution, audio and clip length, and its price moves with output resolution. Both are charged in Versely credits.

    How long a clip can Wan 3.0 Prime Text to Video and Pixverse Text to Video generate?+

    Wan 3.0 Prime Text to Video supports 2s, 3s, 4s, 5s, 6s, 7s, 8s, 9s, 10s, 11s, 12s, 13s, 14s, 15s; Pixverse Text to Video supports 5s, 8s, 10s.

    Try both inside Versely

    The all-in-one AI studio for creators. 60+ models for video, image, voice, music and lipsync, in your browser or on your phone.

    Free on the web and on iPhone, one account.