Video models · Wan vs Runway

    Wan 3.0 Text to Video vs Runway Gen-4.5

    Wan 3.0 Text to Video runs 6-168 credits a job, Runway Gen-4.5 runs 200-400 credits.

    Which should you pick?

    Wan 3.0 Text to Video is the cheaper job: 6-168 credits against 200-400 credits for Runway Gen-4.5. Those are the credits one complete generation costs, not a headline rate, so they are directly comparable even though the two models bill differently.

    At their most expensive settings the gap widens: Runway Gen-4.5 tops out at 400 credits a job versus 168, driven by clip length.

    Wan 3.0 Text to Video holds the stronger leaderboard position (#1 in text to video against #17 in text to video). Those are two different leaderboards unless the category matches — Versely ranks each capability separately.

    Runway Gen-4.5 supports more aspect ratios (6: 16:9, 9:16, 4:3, 3:4, 1:1, 21:9), giving it more format flexibility.

    What a job costs

    Wan 3.0 Text to Video

    6-168 credits

    It bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and the price moves with output resolution.

    • SD3 credits
    • HD6 credits
    • 4K12 credits

    Runway Gen-4.5

    200-400 credits

    It bills per second of output, and the price moves with clip length.

    • Price40 credits

    All figures are Versely credits. Your plan's credit allowance is on the pricing page.

    Spec comparison

    SpecWan 3.0 Text to VideoRunway Gen-4.5
    ProviderWanRunway
    Cost per job6-168 credits200-400 credits
    Billingper second, at a rate that changes with output resolutionper second of output
    Max resolution1080p
    Aspect ratios16:9, 9:16, 1:1, 4:3, 3:416:9, 9:16, 4:3, 3:4, 1:1, 21:9
    Durations2s, 3s, 4s, 5s, 6s, 7s, 8s, 9s, 10s, 11s, 12s, 13s, 14s, 15s5s, 10s
    Frame rates
    Qualities480p, 720p, 1080p
    Requires starting imageNoNo
    Accepts video inputNoNo
    Reference images
    Leaderboard#1 in text to video#17 in text to video
    ReleasedAug 23, 2026Nov 30, 2025

    What each one does that the other doesn't

    Only Wan 3.0 Text to Video

    text driven, native audio, top ranked, prompt expansion

    Only Runway Gen-4.5

    image to video, image to video, camera control

    Both list: text to video, cinematic.

    Leaderboard positions

    Versely ranks each capability on its own leaderboard, so a position is only comparable between two models within the same row.

    Wan 3.0 Text to Video

    • Text to video#1

    Runway Gen-4.5

    • Text to video#17
    • Image to video#21

    More comparisons

    Frequently asked questions

    Which is cheaper, Wan 3.0 Text to Video or Runway Gen-4.5?+

    Wan 3.0 Text to Video is cheaper per job: 6-168 credits against 200-400 credits for Runway Gen-4.5.

    What can Wan 3.0 Text to Video do that Runway Gen-4.5 can't, or vice versa?+

    Only Wan 3.0 Text to Video lists text driven, native audio, top ranked, prompt expansion. Only Runway Gen-4.5 lists image to video, image to video, camera control. Both list text to video, cinematic.

    How do Wan 3.0 Text to Video and Runway Gen-4.5 bill?+

    Wan 3.0 Text to Video bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and its price moves with output resolution. Runway Gen-4.5 bills per second of output, and its price moves with clip length. Both are charged in Versely credits.

    Which ranks higher, Wan 3.0 Text to Video or Runway Gen-4.5?+

    Wan 3.0 Text to Video sits at #1 in text to video and Runway Gen-4.5 at #17 in text to video on Versely's live model rankings. Versely ranks each capability on its own leaderboard, so those positions are only a direct comparison when the category is the same.

    How long a clip can Wan 3.0 Text to Video and Runway Gen-4.5 generate?+

    Wan 3.0 Text to Video supports 2s, 3s, 4s, 5s, 6s, 7s, 8s, 9s, 10s, 11s, 12s, 13s, 14s, 15s; Runway Gen-4.5 supports 5s, 10s.

    Try both inside Versely

    The all-in-one AI studio for creators. 60+ models for video, image, voice, music and lipsync — in your browser or on your phone.