Which should you pick?
Wan Video 2.5 Text to Video is the cheaper job: 20-120 credits against 23-67 credits for Vidu Q3 Video. Those are the credits one complete generation costs, not a headline rate, so they are directly comparable even though the two models bill differently.
At their most expensive settings the gap widens: Wan Video 2.5 Text to Video tops out at 120 credits a job versus 67, driven by output resolution.
Vidu Q3 Video supports more aspect ratios (5: 16:9, 9:16, 4:3, 3:4, 1:1), giving it more format flexibility.
What a job costs
Wan Video 2.5 Text to Video
20-120 credits
It bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and the price moves with output resolution.
- SD4 credits
- HD8 credits
- 4K12 credits
Vidu Q3 Video
23-67 credits
It bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and the price moves with output resolution.
- SD5 credits
- HD/4K5 credits
All figures are Versely credits. Your plan's credit allowance is on the pricing page.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Wan Video 2.5 Text to Video | Vidu Q3 Video |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Wan | Vidu |
| Cost per job | 20-120 credits | 23-67 credits |
| Billing | per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution | per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution |
| Max resolution | 1080p | 1080p |
| Aspect ratios | 16:9, 9:16, 1:1 | 16:9, 9:16, 4:3, 3:4, 1:1 |
| Durations | 5s, 10s | 5s, 10s, 15s |
| Frame rates | 24fps, 30fps, 60fps | — |
| Qualities | 480p, 720p, 1080p | 1080p, 360p, 540p, 720p |
| Requires starting image | No | No |
| Accepts video input | No | No |
| Reference images | — | — |
| Leaderboard | Unranked | #26 in text to video |
| Released | Sep 24, 2025 | Jan 30, 2026 |
What each one does that the other doesn't
Only Wan Video 2.5 Text to Video
professional
Only Vidu Q3 Video
creative
Both list: text to video, high quality, text to video.
Leaderboard positions
Versely ranks each capability on its own leaderboard, so a position is only comparable between two models within the same row.
Wan Video 2.5 Text to Video
Not on a Versely leaderboard yet.
Vidu Q3 Video
- Text to video#26
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Wan Video 2.5 Text to Video or Vidu Q3 Video?+
Wan Video 2.5 Text to Video is cheaper per job: 20-120 credits against 23-67 credits for Vidu Q3 Video.
What can Wan Video 2.5 Text to Video do that Vidu Q3 Video can't, or vice versa?+
Only Wan Video 2.5 Text to Video lists professional. Only Vidu Q3 Video lists creative. Both list text to video, high quality, text to video.
How do Wan Video 2.5 Text to Video and Vidu Q3 Video bill?+
Wan Video 2.5 Text to Video bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and its price moves with output resolution. Vidu Q3 Video bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and its price moves with output resolution. Both are charged in Versely credits.
How long a clip can Wan Video 2.5 Text to Video and Vidu Q3 Video generate?+
Wan Video 2.5 Text to Video supports 5s, 10s; Vidu Q3 Video supports 5s, 10s, 15s.
Try both inside Versely
The all-in-one AI studio for creators. 60+ models for video, image, voice, music and lipsync, in your browser or on your phone.
Free on the web and on iPhone, one account.