Which should you pick?
LTX 2.5 Text to Video Pro is the cheaper job: 58-136 credits against 64-256 credits for VEO 3.1. Those are the credits one complete generation costs, not a headline rate, so they are directly comparable even though the two models bill differently.
At their most expensive settings the gap widens: VEO 3.1 tops out at 256 credits a job versus 136, driven by audio options.
VEO 3.1 supports up to 4K, the higher of the two.
VEO 3.1 holds the stronger leaderboard position (#20 in text to video against #25 in text to video). Those are two different leaderboards unless the category matches — Versely ranks each capability separately.
VEO 3.1 supports more aspect ratios (3: 16:9, 9:16, auto), giving it more format flexibility.
What a job costs
VEO 3.1
64-256 credits
It bills by whether audio is generated, and the price moves with audio options.
- Audio off16 credits
- Audio on32 credits
LTX 2.5 Text to Video Pro
58-136 credits
It bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and the price moves with output resolution.
- SD/HD10 credits
- 4K14 credits
All figures are Versely credits. Your plan's credit allowance is on the pricing page.
Spec comparison
| Spec | VEO 3.1 | LTX 2.5 Text to Video Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | LTX | |
| Cost per job | 64-256 credits | 58-136 credits |
| Billing | by whether audio is generated | per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution |
| Max resolution | 4K | 1080p |
| Aspect ratios | 16:9, 9:16, auto | 16:9, 9:16 |
| Durations | 4s, 6s, 8s | 6s, 8s, 10s |
| Frame rates | 24fps, 30fps, 60fps | 24, 25, 50 |
| Qualities | 720p, 1080p, 4K | 720p, 1080p |
| Requires starting image | No | No |
| Accepts video input | No | No |
| Reference images | — | — |
| Leaderboard | #20 in text to video | #25 in text to video |
| Released | Oct 15, 2025 | Aug 24, 2026 |
What each one does that the other doesn't
Only VEO 3.1
cinematic, enhanced, premium
Only LTX 2.5 Text to Video Pro
pro, text driven, native audio, high fidelity, camera motion
Both list: text to video.
Leaderboard positions
Versely ranks each capability on its own leaderboard, so a position is only comparable between two models within the same row.
VEO 3.1
- Text to video#20
- Image to video#31
LTX 2.5 Text to Video Pro
- Text to video#25
More comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, VEO 3.1 or LTX 2.5 Text to Video Pro?+
LTX 2.5 Text to Video Pro is cheaper per job: 58-136 credits against 64-256 credits for VEO 3.1.
What can VEO 3.1 do that LTX 2.5 Text to Video Pro can't, or vice versa?+
Only VEO 3.1 lists cinematic, enhanced, premium. Only LTX 2.5 Text to Video Pro lists pro, text driven, native audio, high fidelity, camera motion. Both list text to video.
How do VEO 3.1 and LTX 2.5 Text to Video Pro bill?+
VEO 3.1 bills by whether audio is generated, and its price moves with audio options. LTX 2.5 Text to Video Pro bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and its price moves with output resolution. Both are charged in Versely credits.
Which has higher output resolution, VEO 3.1 or LTX 2.5 Text to Video Pro?+
VEO 3.1 supports higher output (4K against 1080p).
Which ranks higher, VEO 3.1 or LTX 2.5 Text to Video Pro?+
VEO 3.1 sits at #20 in text to video and LTX 2.5 Text to Video Pro at #25 in text to video on Versely's live model rankings. Versely ranks each capability on its own leaderboard, so those positions are only a direct comparison when the category is the same.
Try both inside Versely
The all-in-one AI studio for creators. 60+ models for video, image, voice, music and lipsync — in your browser or on your phone.
Free account. Works in your browser - no install needed. The same account signs in on your phone.