Video models · Google vs Pixverse

    VEO 3.1 vs Pixverse V6 Text to Video

    VEO 3.1 runs 64-256 credits a job, Pixverse V6 Text to Video runs 10-58 credits.

    Which should you pick?

    Pixverse V6 Text to Video is the cheaper job: 10-58 credits against 64-256 credits for VEO 3.1. Those are the credits one complete generation costs, not a headline rate, so they are directly comparable even though the two models bill differently.

    At their most expensive settings the gap widens: VEO 3.1 tops out at 256 credits a job versus 58, driven by audio options.

    VEO 3.1 supports up to 4K, the higher of the two.

    Pixverse V6 Text to Video holds the stronger leaderboard position (#15 in text to video against #18 in text to video). Those are two different leaderboards unless the category matches — Versely ranks each capability separately.

    Pixverse V6 Text to Video supports more aspect ratios (8: 16:9, 4:3, 1:1, 3:4, 9:16, 2:3, 3:2, 21:9), giving it more format flexibility.

    What a job costs

    VEO 3.1

    64-256 credits

    It bills by whether audio is generated, and the price moves with audio options.

    • Audio off16 credits
    • Audio on32 credits

    Pixverse V6 Text to Video

    10-58 credits

    It bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and the price moves with output resolution.

    • SD2 credits
    • HD4 credits
    • 4K8 credits

    All figures are Versely credits. Your plan's credit allowance is on the pricing page.

    Spec comparison

    SpecVEO 3.1Pixverse V6 Text to Video
    ProviderGooglePixverse
    Cost per job64-256 credits10-58 credits
    Billingby whether audio is generatedper second, at a rate that changes with output resolution
    Max resolution4K1080p
    Aspect ratios16:9, 9:16, auto16:9, 4:3, 1:1, 3:4, 9:16, 2:3, 3:2, 21:9
    Durations4s, 6s, 8s5s, 8s
    Frame rates24fps, 30fps, 60fps—
    Qualities720p, 1080p, 4K360p, 540p, 720p, 1080p
    Requires starting imageNoNo
    Accepts video inputNoNo
    Reference images——
    Leaderboard#18 in text to video#15 in text to video
    ReleasedOct 15, 2025Mar 30, 2026

    What each one does that the other doesn't

    Only VEO 3.1

    cinematic, enhanced, premium

    Only Pixverse V6 Text to Video

    motion, audio, 1080p, pixverse

    Both list: text to video.

    Leaderboard positions

    Versely ranks each capability on its own leaderboard, so a position is only comparable between two models within the same row.

    VEO 3.1

    • Text to video#18
    • Image to video#31

    Pixverse V6 Text to Video

    • Text to video#15

    More comparisons

    Frequently asked questions

    Which is cheaper, VEO 3.1 or Pixverse V6 Text to Video?+

    Pixverse V6 Text to Video is cheaper per job: 10-58 credits against 64-256 credits for VEO 3.1.

    What can VEO 3.1 do that Pixverse V6 Text to Video can't, or vice versa?+

    Only VEO 3.1 lists cinematic, enhanced, premium. Only Pixverse V6 Text to Video lists motion, audio, 1080p, pixverse. Both list text to video.

    How do VEO 3.1 and Pixverse V6 Text to Video bill?+

    VEO 3.1 bills by whether audio is generated, and its price moves with audio options. Pixverse V6 Text to Video bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and its price moves with output resolution. Both are charged in Versely credits.

    Which has higher output resolution, VEO 3.1 or Pixverse V6 Text to Video?+

    VEO 3.1 supports higher output (4K against 1080p).

    Which ranks higher, VEO 3.1 or Pixverse V6 Text to Video?+

    VEO 3.1 sits at #18 in text to video and Pixverse V6 Text to Video at #15 in text to video on Versely's live model rankings. Versely ranks each capability on its own leaderboard, so those positions are only a direct comparison when the category is the same.

    Try both inside Versely

    The all-in-one AI studio for creators. 60+ models for video, image, voice, music and lipsync, in your browser or on your phone.

    Free on the web and on iPhone, one account.