Reboiler duty is overlay copy, not another shell-tube nameplate
shell-tube-exchanger-oem already stamped TEMA on the shell in Ideogram. This leftover is kettle/thermosyphon duty: overlay MMBtu and circulation as authored type. Do not let Veo invent a heat-transfer area. No talking exchanger engineer.
shell-tube-exchanger-oem already stamped TEMA on the shell in Ideogram. This leftover is kettle/thermosyphon duty: overlay MMBtu and circulation as authored type. Do not let Veo invent a heat-transfer area. No talking exchanger engineer.
Heat-exchanger model numbers live on the shell in Ideogram already spent the TEMA type and area as letters on the photographed shell. A reboiler listing is not a second nameplate. The leftover claim is kettle or thermosyphon duty, MMBtu, circulation — type you write after picture lock. A video model asked to “show the duty on the can” will mint area, crawl the digits, and invent an engineer.
TEMA already lives on the shell; duty is leftover copy
Buyers already saw BEM versus AES, square feet of area, nozzle clock. That plate is done. The leftover question is duty: kettle versus thermosyphon, how many MMBtu/h this unit delivers, what circulation you will stand behind. Those lines change when the process case changes. A nameplate generate does not.
Do not restamp the shell with 12.4 MMBtu/h baked into the metal. Offers change. A wrong area on a new plate is a different duty and a different TEMA lie. Keep the shell still you already approved. Burn duty as overlay.
Photograph the actual kettle or thermosyphon if the listing has to be this serial — saddle, vapor outlet, weir or circulation nozzles. Or keep the catalog shell from the TEMA job. Do not generate a cousin bundle so the duty has a prettier can. A different nozzle clock is a different exchanger.
Heat-transfer area is not this leftover. Area was the TEMA stamp. If Veo paints 1240 ft² onto a kettle it invented, you sold a different surface. Discard that take. You cannot edit a glyph the generate invented the way you can change overlay copy.
Overlay MMBtu and circulation after picture lock
Rated duty, circulation, kettle versus thermosyphon — those lines are the listing. Video models do not typeset them. On-screen glyphs in a generate have to be right every frame. They will not be.
Add a text overlay to a video burns one authored line for the whole clip. Position is top, center, or bottom. It does not transcribe. Write the string as it sits on the catalog PDF. 12.4 MMBtu/h kettle is a line. “High-duty reboiler” is a vibe.
If you needed duty at 0s and circulation at 4s, that is add timed text overlays to a video: lines you wrote at start_sec and end_sec. Font, size, colour, and position apply to the set, not per line. Nothing is transcribed. A single persistent badge is the simpler overlay, not a timed set with one line from 0 to 8.
Add a text overlay to my video is the named agent job for the one-line case: the video, the exact text, and where it should sit. Flat per-video credit fee, shown before rendering. It does not listen to the clip.
Auto-captions listen. A mute shell has nothing to transcribe. Prompted type inside a video model is a misspelled duty you cannot edit without a new generate. Crop to the ship ratio before you overlay. Picture lock, then type. Cases change. The shell should not.
Do not let Veo invent the area, or a mouth
Veo 3.1 is native audio, official 4K tier, 4 / 6 / 8 second clips. It is a good cinematic talking row. It is a bad nameplate row. “Kettle reboiler, 12 MMBtu, engineer explaining duty” will draw letterforms, wander nozzles, and grow a person. Those letterforms will not be your legal string. 4K does not fix a wrong glyph.
The leftover job is overlay on an approved plate. Motion, if you need it, is camera on the shell you already have — not a text-to-video plant tour. Inspect the midpoint. The middle is where a generator grows a second outlet and a second area.
A talking applications engineer prescribing a duty is a different film, and it needs a real named person. Leave the constructed mouth off the datasheet. Labelling the face AI does not make the duty true.
Nearby /for is the plant. This is leftover duty.
Manufacturers already have a surface for the factory floor — lines, sparks, scale for procurement. That page is the plant. The heat-exchanger post is one shell’s TEMA stamp. This page is kettle versus thermosyphon copy on that shell. Do not rewrite the plant page as a duty demo. Do not drop this leftover into a residential HVAC reel.
Do not prompt Veo to letter MMBtu on the nameplate. Do not generate a second TEMA plate. Do not invent heat-transfer area as a close-up of digits. Do not cast a synthetic engineer to walk circulation.
Hold the shell you already stamped. Overlay the duty you will stand behind. Pause the clip. If the area changed, a video model redesigned the bundle. If a person appeared who was not in the still, you populated the pad. Crop them or reshoot.
FAQ
Can Veo 3.1 letter MMBtu on the nameplate if I spell it in the prompt?
It can draw something that looks like a duty. It will not be a string legal can ship, and it will often invent area while it pretends to typeset. Overlay MMBtu and circulation after picture lock. Veo is native audio, 4K tier, 4 / 6 / 8 second cinematic clips — extras, not this leftover.
The shell already has a TEMA plate. Do I stamp duty in Ideogram too?
No. The heat-exchanger post already stamped TEMA type and area on the shell. Duty is leftover copy. Burn it as overlay so the number can change without restamping the metal.
One overlay or timed lines?
One persistent duty badge is a single overlay on the whole file. MMBtu, then circulation, then a CTA is timed overlays, with timestamps you set. Neither job transcribes. Neither job belongs in a Veo prompt.
Is a talking AI exchanger engineer acceptable if we disclose it?
Disclosure does not make the duty true and does not move a constructed expert off a datasheet. Keep the shell. Keep the overlay. If someone must speak a case, that someone is a real named person, not a generate.