Video models · Grok vs Kling

    Grok Imagine Video vs Kling 2.5 Turbo

    Grok Imagine Video runs 24-168 credits a job, Kling 2.5 Turbo runs 17-34 credits.

    Which should you pick?

    Kling 2.5 Turbo is the cheaper job: 17-34 credits against 24-168 credits for Grok Imagine Video. Those are the credits one complete generation costs, not a headline rate, so they are directly comparable even though the two models bill differently.

    At their most expensive settings the gap widens: Grok Imagine Video tops out at 168 credits a job versus 34, driven by output resolution.

    Grok Imagine Video supports more aspect ratios (7: 16:9, 3:2, 4:3, 1:1, 3:4, 2:3, 9:16), giving it more format flexibility.

    What a job costs

    Grok Imagine Video

    24-168 credits

    It bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and the price moves with output resolution.

    • SD4 credits
    • HD/4K6 credits

    Kling 2.5 Turbo

    17-34 credits

    It bills a base charge plus a per-second rate, and the price moves with clip length.

    • First 5s17 credits
    • Each extra second4 credits

    All figures are Versely credits. Your plan's credit allowance is on the pricing page.

    Spec comparison

    SpecGrok Imagine VideoKling 2.5 Turbo
    ProviderGrokKling
    Cost per job24-168 credits17-34 credits
    Billingper second, at a rate that changes with output resolutiona base charge plus a per-second rate
    Max resolution1080p1080p
    Aspect ratios16:9, 3:2, 4:3, 1:1, 3:4, 2:3, 9:1616:9, 9:16, 1:1
    Durations6s, 10s, 15s, 20s, 30s5s, 10s
    Frame rates24fps, 30fps, 60fps
    Qualities1080p, 480p, 720p1080p
    Requires starting imageNoNo
    Accepts video inputNoNo
    Reference images
    Leaderboard#10 in text to video#10 in image to video
    ReleasedJul 27, 2025Sep 22, 2025

    What each one does that the other doesn't

    Only Grok Imagine Video

    innovative, image to video, smart

    Only Kling 2.5 Turbo

    turbo, efficient, quality

    Both list: text to video.

    Leaderboard positions

    Versely ranks each capability on its own leaderboard, so a position is only comparable between two models within the same row.

    Grok Imagine Video

    • Text to video#10

    Kling 2.5 Turbo

    • Image to video#10
    • Text to video#25

    More comparisons

    Frequently asked questions

    Which is cheaper, Grok Imagine Video or Kling 2.5 Turbo?+

    Kling 2.5 Turbo is cheaper per job: 17-34 credits against 24-168 credits for Grok Imagine Video.

    What can Grok Imagine Video do that Kling 2.5 Turbo can't, or vice versa?+

    Only Grok Imagine Video lists innovative, image to video, smart. Only Kling 2.5 Turbo lists turbo, efficient, quality. Both list text to video.

    How do Grok Imagine Video and Kling 2.5 Turbo bill?+

    Grok Imagine Video bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and its price moves with output resolution. Kling 2.5 Turbo bills a base charge plus a per-second rate, and its price moves with clip length. Both are charged in Versely credits.

    Which ranks higher, Grok Imagine Video or Kling 2.5 Turbo?+

    Grok Imagine Video sits at #10 in text to video and Kling 2.5 Turbo at #10 in image to video on Versely's live model rankings. Versely ranks each capability on its own leaderboard, so those positions are only a direct comparison when the category is the same.

    How long a clip can Grok Imagine Video and Kling 2.5 Turbo generate?+

    Grok Imagine Video supports 6s, 10s, 15s, 20s, 30s; Kling 2.5 Turbo supports 5s, 10s.

    Try both inside Versely

    The all-in-one AI studio for creators. 60+ models for video, image, voice, music and lipsync — in your browser or on your phone.