Which should you pick?
Luma Ray 3.2 is the cheaper job: 40-320 credits against 56-112 credits for Kling Video V2.6 Pro Text to Video. Those are the credits one complete generation costs, not a headline rate, so they are directly comparable even though the two models bill differently.
At their most expensive settings the gap widens: Luma Ray 3.2 tops out at 320 credits a job versus 112, driven by output resolution.
Luma Ray 3.2 supports more aspect ratios (6: 16:9, 9:16, 1:1, 4:3, 3:4, 21:9), giving it more format flexibility.
What a job costs
Kling Video V2.6 Pro Text to Video
56-112 credits
It bills a base charge plus a per-second rate, and the price moves with clip length.
- First 5s56 credits
- Each extra second12 credits
Luma Ray 3.2
40-320 credits
It bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and the price moves with output resolution.
- SD8 credits
- HD16 credits
- 4K32 credits
All figures are Versely credits. Your plan's credit allowance is on the pricing page.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Kling Video V2.6 Pro Text to Video | Luma Ray 3.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Kling | Luma |
| Cost per job | 56-112 credits | 40-320 credits |
| Billing | a base charge plus a per-second rate | per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution |
| Max resolution | 1080p | 1080p |
| Aspect ratios | 16:9, 9:16, 1:1 | 16:9, 9:16, 1:1, 4:3, 3:4, 21:9 |
| Durations | 5s, 10s | 5s, 10s |
| Frame rates | 24fps, 30fps, 60fps | — |
| Qualities | 1080p | 540p, 720p, 1080p |
| Requires starting image | No | No |
| Accepts video input | No | No |
| Reference images | — | — |
| Leaderboard | Unranked | Unranked |
| Released | Dec 3, 2025 | Jun 9, 2026 |
What each one does that the other doesn't
Only Kling Video V2.6 Pro Text to Video
professional, v2.6
Only Luma Ray 3.2
up to 10s, cinematic motion, up to 1080p
Both list: text to video, text to video.
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Kling Video V2.6 Pro Text to Video or Luma Ray 3.2?+
Luma Ray 3.2 is cheaper per job: 40-320 credits against 56-112 credits for Kling Video V2.6 Pro Text to Video.
What can Kling Video V2.6 Pro Text to Video do that Luma Ray 3.2 can't, or vice versa?+
Only Kling Video V2.6 Pro Text to Video lists professional, v2.6. Only Luma Ray 3.2 lists up to 10s, cinematic motion, up to 1080p. Both list text to video, text to video.
How do Kling Video V2.6 Pro Text to Video and Luma Ray 3.2 bill?+
Kling Video V2.6 Pro Text to Video bills a base charge plus a per-second rate, and its price moves with clip length. Luma Ray 3.2 bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and its price moves with output resolution. Both are charged in Versely credits.
How long a clip can Kling Video V2.6 Pro Text to Video and Luma Ray 3.2 generate?+
Kling Video V2.6 Pro Text to Video supports 5s, 10s; Luma Ray 3.2 supports 5s, 10s.
Try both inside Versely
The all-in-one AI studio for creators. 60+ models for video, image, voice, music and lipsync, in your browser or on your phone.
Free on the web and on iPhone, one account.