Image models · Google vs OpenAI

    Nano Banana 2.1 vs GPT Image 2.5 Flare Edit

    Nano Banana 2.1 runs 4-7 credits a job, GPT Image 2.5 Flare Edit runs 4-7 credits.

    Which should you pick?

    Nano Banana 2.1 and GPT Image 2.5 Flare Edit start at the same 4 credits for a complete generation.

    GPT Image 2.5 Flare Edit holds the stronger leaderboard position (#2 in edit image against #4 in text to image). Those are two different leaderboards unless the category matches — Versely ranks each capability separately.

    GPT Image 2.5 Flare Edit supports more aspect ratios (16: auto, 1:1, 3:2, 2:3, 4:3, 3:4, 16:9, 9:16, 2:1, 1:2, 3:1, 1:3, 21:9, 9:21, 5:4, 4:5), giving it more format flexibility.

    GPT Image 2.5 Flare Edit requires a starting image; Nano Banana 2.1 can generate from a text prompt alone.

    What a job costs

    Nano Banana 2.1

    4-7 credits

    It bills a flat rate that changes with output resolution, and the price moves with output resolution.

    • SD/HD4 credits
    • 4K7 credits

    GPT Image 2.5 Flare Edit

    4-7 credits

    It bills quality resolution flat, and the price moves with output resolution.

    • SD/HD4 credits
    • 4K7 credits

    All figures are Versely credits. Your plan's credit allowance is on the pricing page.

    Spec comparison

    SpecNano Banana 2.1GPT Image 2.5 Flare Edit
    ProviderGoogleOpenAI
    Cost per job4-7 credits4-7 credits
    Billinga flat rate that changes with output resolutionquality resolution flat
    Max resolution4K4K
    Aspect ratios8:1, 4:1, 21:9, 16:9, 3:2, 4:3, 5:4, 1:1, 4:5, 3:4, 2:3, 9:16, 1:4, 1:8, autoauto, 1:1, 3:2, 2:3, 4:3, 3:4, 16:9, 9:16, 2:1, 1:2, 3:1, 1:3, 21:9, 9:21, 5:4, 4:5
    Durations——
    Frame rates——
    Qualities1K, 2K, 4K1K, 2K, 4K
    Requires starting imageNoYes
    Accepts video inputNoNo
    Reference imagesUp to 10—
    Leaderboard#4 in text to image#2 in edit image
    ReleasedOct 8, 2026Sep 8, 2026

    What each one does that the other doesn't

    Only Nano Banana 2.1

    text to image, text to image, image editing, text rendering, character consistency, multi reference, 4k

    Only GPT Image 2.5 Flare Edit

    gpt, edit, multi image input, mask, high fidelity, up to 4k

    Both list: image to image, edit image.

    Leaderboard positions

    Versely ranks each capability on its own leaderboard, so a position is only comparable between two models within the same row.

    Nano Banana 2.1

    • Edit image#4
    • Text to image#4

    GPT Image 2.5 Flare Edit

    • Edit image#2

    More comparisons

    Frequently asked questions

    Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2.1 or GPT Image 2.5 Flare Edit?+

    Neither — both start at 4 credits for a complete generation on Versely.

    What can Nano Banana 2.1 do that GPT Image 2.5 Flare Edit can't, or vice versa?+

    Only Nano Banana 2.1 lists text to image, text to image, image editing, text rendering, character consistency, multi reference, 4k. Only GPT Image 2.5 Flare Edit lists gpt, edit, multi image input, mask, high fidelity, up to 4k. Both list image to image, edit image.

    How do Nano Banana 2.1 and GPT Image 2.5 Flare Edit bill?+

    Nano Banana 2.1 bills a flat rate that changes with output resolution, and its price moves with output resolution. GPT Image 2.5 Flare Edit bills quality resolution flat, and its price moves with output resolution. Both are charged in Versely credits.

    Which ranks higher, Nano Banana 2.1 or GPT Image 2.5 Flare Edit?+

    Nano Banana 2.1 sits at #4 in text to image and GPT Image 2.5 Flare Edit at #2 in edit image on Versely's live model rankings. Versely ranks each capability on its own leaderboard, so those positions are only a direct comparison when the category is the same.

    Try both inside Versely

    The all-in-one AI studio for creators. 60+ models for video, image, voice, music and lipsync, in your browser or on your phone.

    Free on the web and on iPhone, one account.