Video models · ByteDance vs Kling

    Seedance 2.0 vs Kling 3 Turbo Text to Video

    Seedance 2.0 runs 44-3277 credits a job, Kling 3 Turbo Text to Video runs 22-108 credits.

    Which should you pick?

    Kling 3 Turbo Text to Video is the cheaper job: 22-108 credits against 44-3277 credits for Seedance 2.0. Those are the credits one complete generation costs, not a headline rate, so they are directly comparable even though the two models bill differently.

    At their most expensive settings the gap widens: Seedance 2.0 tops out at 3277 credits a job versus 108, driven by output resolution.

    Seedance 2.0 supports up to 4k, the higher of the two.

    Seedance 2.0 supports more aspect ratios (8: 21:9, 16:9, 4:3, 1:1, 3:4, 9:16, adaptive, auto), giving it more format flexibility.

    What a job costs

    Seedance 2.0

    44-3277 credits

    It bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and the price moves with output resolution.

    • SD11 credits
    • HD25 credits
    • 4K219 credits

    Kling 3 Turbo Text to Video

    22-108 credits

    It bills per second of output, and the price moves with clip length.

    • Price8 credits

    All figures are Versely credits. Your plan's credit allowance is on the pricing page.

    Spec comparison

    SpecSeedance 2.0Kling 3 Turbo Text to Video
    ProviderByteDanceKling
    Cost per job44-3277 credits22-108 credits
    Billingper second, at a rate that changes with output resolutionper second of output
    Max resolution4k1080p
    Aspect ratios21:9, 16:9, 4:3, 1:1, 3:4, 9:16, adaptive, auto16:9, 9:16, 1:1
    Durations4s, 5s, 6s, 7s, 8s, 9s, 10s, 11s, 12s, 13s, 14s, 15s3s, 4s, 5s, 6s, 7s, 8s, 9s, 10s, 11s, 12s, 13s, 14s, 15s
    Frame rates——
    Qualities480p, 720p, 1080p, 4k720p, 1080p
    Requires starting imageNoNo
    Accepts video inputYesNo
    Reference images——
    Leaderboard#6 in text to videoUnranked
    ReleasedFeb 12, 2026Jun 17, 2026

    What each one does that the other doesn't

    Only Seedance 2.0

    reference to video, cinematic, audio sync, camera control, lighting control, high quality

    Only Kling 3 Turbo Text to Video

    Nothing the other one doesn't also list.

    Both list: text to video, text to video.

    Leaderboard positions

    Versely ranks each capability on its own leaderboard, so a position is only comparable between two models within the same row.

    Seedance 2.0

    • Image to video#6
    • Text to video#6

    Kling 3 Turbo Text to Video

    Not on a Versely leaderboard yet.

    More comparisons

    Frequently asked questions

    Which is cheaper, Seedance 2.0 or Kling 3 Turbo Text to Video?+

    Kling 3 Turbo Text to Video is cheaper per job: 22-108 credits against 44-3277 credits for Seedance 2.0.

    What can Seedance 2.0 do that Kling 3 Turbo Text to Video can't, or vice versa?+

    Only Seedance 2.0 lists reference to video, cinematic, audio sync, camera control, lighting control, high quality. Both list text to video, text to video.

    How do Seedance 2.0 and Kling 3 Turbo Text to Video bill?+

    Seedance 2.0 bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and its price moves with output resolution. Kling 3 Turbo Text to Video bills per second of output, and its price moves with clip length. Both are charged in Versely credits.

    Which has higher output resolution, Seedance 2.0 or Kling 3 Turbo Text to Video?+

    Seedance 2.0 supports higher output (4k against 1080p).

    How long a clip can Seedance 2.0 and Kling 3 Turbo Text to Video generate?+

    Seedance 2.0 supports 4s, 5s, 6s, 7s, 8s, 9s, 10s, 11s, 12s, 13s, 14s, 15s; Kling 3 Turbo Text to Video supports 3s, 4s, 5s, 6s, 7s, 8s, 9s, 10s, 11s, 12s, 13s, 14s, 15s.

    Try both inside Versely

    The all-in-one AI studio for creators. 60+ models for video, image, voice, music and lipsync — in your browser or on your phone.