Which should you pick?
Kling 3 Turbo Text to Video is the cheaper job: 28-135 credits against 54-4096 credits for Seedance 2.0. Those are the credits one complete generation costs, not a headline rate, so they are directly comparable even though the two models bill differently.
At their most expensive settings the gap widens: Seedance 2.0 tops out at 4096 credits a job versus 135, driven by output resolution.
Seedance 2.0 supports up to 4k, the higher of the two.
Seedance 2.0 supports more aspect ratios (8: 21:9, 16:9, 4:3, 1:1, 3:4, 9:16, adaptive, auto), giving it more format flexibility.
What a job costs
Seedance 2.0
54-4096 credits
It bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and the price moves with output resolution.
- SD14 credits
- HD31 credits
- 4K274 credits
Kling 3 Turbo Text to Video
28-135 credits
It bills per second of output, and the price moves with clip length.
- Price10 credits
All figures are Versely credits. Your plan's credit allowance is on the pricing page.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Seedance 2.0 | Kling 3 Turbo Text to Video |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | ByteDance | Kling |
| Cost per job | 54-4096 credits | 28-135 credits |
| Billing | per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution | per second of output |
| Max resolution | 4k | 1080p |
| Aspect ratios | 21:9, 16:9, 4:3, 1:1, 3:4, 9:16, adaptive, auto | 16:9, 9:16, 1:1 |
| Durations | 4s, 5s, 6s, 7s, 8s, 9s, 10s, 11s, 12s, 13s, 14s, 15s | 3s, 4s, 5s, 6s, 7s, 8s, 9s, 10s, 11s, 12s, 13s, 14s, 15s |
| Frame rates | — | — |
| Qualities | 480p, 720p, 1080p, 4k | 720p, 1080p |
| Requires starting image | No | No |
| Accepts video input | Yes | No |
| Reference images | — | — |
| Leaderboard | #3 in image to video | Unranked |
| Released | Feb 12, 2026 | Jun 17, 2026 |
What each one does that the other doesn't
Only Seedance 2.0
reference to video, cinematic, audio sync, camera control, lighting control, high quality
Only Kling 3 Turbo Text to Video
Nothing the other one doesn't also list.
Both list: text to video, text to video.
Leaderboard positions
Versely ranks each capability on its own leaderboard, so a position is only comparable between two models within the same row.
Seedance 2.0
- Image to video#3
- Text to video#4
Kling 3 Turbo Text to Video
Not on a Versely leaderboard yet.
Full Seedance 2.0 spec sheet →
Seedance 2.0 generates Hollywood-grade cinematic videos from text prompts with native audio-visual synchronization, director-level camera and lighting control, and exceptional motion stability
Full Kling 3 Turbo Text to Video spec sheet →
Kling 3 Turbo fast text-to-video generation.
More comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Seedance 2.0 or Kling 3 Turbo Text to Video?+
Kling 3 Turbo Text to Video is cheaper per job: 28-135 credits against 54-4096 credits for Seedance 2.0.
What can Seedance 2.0 do that Kling 3 Turbo Text to Video can't, or vice versa?+
Only Seedance 2.0 lists reference to video, cinematic, audio sync, camera control, lighting control, high quality. Both list text to video, text to video.
How do Seedance 2.0 and Kling 3 Turbo Text to Video bill?+
Seedance 2.0 bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and its price moves with output resolution. Kling 3 Turbo Text to Video bills per second of output, and its price moves with clip length. Both are charged in Versely credits.
Which has higher output resolution, Seedance 2.0 or Kling 3 Turbo Text to Video?+
Seedance 2.0 supports higher output (4k against 1080p).
How long a clip can Seedance 2.0 and Kling 3 Turbo Text to Video generate?+
Seedance 2.0 supports 4s, 5s, 6s, 7s, 8s, 9s, 10s, 11s, 12s, 13s, 14s, 15s; Kling 3 Turbo Text to Video supports 3s, 4s, 5s, 6s, 7s, 8s, 9s, 10s, 11s, 12s, 13s, 14s, 15s.
Try both inside Versely
The all-in-one AI studio for creators. 60+ models for video, image, voice, music and lipsync in a single app.