Which should you pick?
LTX 2 Text to Video Pro is the cheaper job: 29-192 credits against 40-320 credits for Luma Ray 3.2. Those are the credits one complete generation costs, not a headline rate, so they are directly comparable even though the two models bill differently.
At their most expensive settings the gap widens: Luma Ray 3.2 tops out at 320 credits a job versus 192, driven by output resolution.
LTX 2 Text to Video Pro supports up to 4K, the higher of the two.
Luma Ray 3.2 supports more aspect ratios (6: 16:9, 9:16, 1:1, 4:3, 3:4, 21:9), giving it more format flexibility.
What a job costs
Luma Ray 3.2
40-320 credits
It bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and the price moves with output resolution.
- SD8 credits
- HD16 credits
- 4K32 credits
LTX 2 Text to Video Pro
29-192 credits
It bills by output resolution, and the price moves with output resolution.
- SD/HD5 credits
- 4K20 credits
All figures are Versely credits. Your plan's credit allowance is on the pricing page.
Spec comparison
| Spec | Luma Ray 3.2 | LTX 2 Text to Video Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Luma | LTX |
| Cost per job | 40-320 credits | 29-192 credits |
| Billing | per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution | by output resolution |
| Max resolution | 1080p | 4K |
| Aspect ratios | 16:9, 9:16, 1:1, 4:3, 3:4, 21:9 | — |
| Durations | 5s, 10s | 6s, 8s, 10s |
| Frame rates | — | 24fps, 30fps |
| Qualities | 540p, 720p, 1080p | 1080p, 1440p, 2160p |
| Requires starting image | No | No |
| Accepts video input | No | No |
| Reference images | — | — |
| Leaderboard | Unranked | Unranked |
| Released | Jun 9, 2026 | Jan 6, 2026 |
What each one does that the other doesn't
Only Luma Ray 3.2
up to 10s, cinematic motion, up to 1080p
Only LTX 2 Text to Video Pro
professional, high quality
Both list: text to video, text to video.
More comparisons
Frequently asked questions
Which is cheaper, Luma Ray 3.2 or LTX 2 Text to Video Pro?+
LTX 2 Text to Video Pro is cheaper per job: 29-192 credits against 40-320 credits for Luma Ray 3.2.
What can Luma Ray 3.2 do that LTX 2 Text to Video Pro can't, or vice versa?+
Only Luma Ray 3.2 lists up to 10s, cinematic motion, up to 1080p. Only LTX 2 Text to Video Pro lists professional, high quality. Both list text to video, text to video.
How do Luma Ray 3.2 and LTX 2 Text to Video Pro bill?+
Luma Ray 3.2 bills per second, at a rate that changes with output resolution, and its price moves with output resolution. LTX 2 Text to Video Pro bills by output resolution, and its price moves with output resolution. Both are charged in Versely credits.
Which has higher output resolution, Luma Ray 3.2 or LTX 2 Text to Video Pro?+
LTX 2 Text to Video Pro supports higher output (4K against 1080p).
How long a clip can Luma Ray 3.2 and LTX 2 Text to Video Pro generate?+
Luma Ray 3.2 supports 5s, 10s; LTX 2 Text to Video Pro supports 6s, 8s, 10s.
Try both inside Versely
The all-in-one AI studio for creators. 60+ models for video, image, voice, music and lipsync, in your browser or on your phone.
Free on the web and on iPhone, one account.