An AI use clause for client contracts
What an agreement should say about AI involvement, ownership limits, who carries the disclosure duty and how indemnity is allocated. With drafting language.
What an agreement should say about AI involvement, ownership limits, who carries the disclosure duty and how indemnity is allocated. With drafting language.
Four written clauses that stop you financing a client's marketing budget: deposit before first render, net-14, a kill fee tied to work, a delivery pause.
A reported billion-dollar licensing deal died when Sora was discontinued. The contract terms brands need to survive a model product being switched off.
Three paid rungs replace the free sample: a test batch, a scoped five-video pack, and a variant retainer, plus the message that moves a brand up one.
Assignment, licence-back, revenue thresholds, IP warranties and indemnity availability differ by generator. The five clauses to read before a deliverable.
Individual generated clips carry no copyright, but the cut you built from them can. How to structure an edit so the human decisions carry the claim.
A per-job records structure for generated work: what to capture at delivery, which three records everyone skips, and a retention clock that starts on use.
A line-item breakdown of both bills: creator fee, seeding, shipping, revisions and usage renewal against stills, generation, lipsync, captions and rerolls.
Usage rights, not production, are where UGC margin lives. A rate card separating base fee from 30-day, 90-day and unlimited buyout, plus enforcing clauses.
CDPA s.9(3) is the reason people assume the UK grants copyright in AI output. It is also untested against generative models, and betting on it is a gamble.
A per-asset record of model, version, prompt, references and human edits answers registration, regulator and client-audit questions. The fields to capture.
Vendor terms can assign you an output file. They cannot make it copyrightable. How to separate contractual ownership from protectability before you ship.
US federal law is moving toward treating likeness as a licensable right, not just a tort you sue over after the fact. What that shift means for consent.
Rendering text in a generated image almost never carries a font obligation. Repackaging the font file into a product you sell sometimes does. Here's the line.
Influencers sell distribution to an audience. UGC creators sell content with no posting requirement. Different rights, disclosure rules, and growth paths.
Organic posting rights aren't paid usage rights, and 'in perpetuity' isn't a formality. A plain-language walkthrough of the clause stack in creator contracts.